logo

Early Intensive Behavioural Intervention (UCLA YAP Model) and Autism Ranking: Strong positive evidence

Future Research

Summary of Existing Research

  • Programmes based on Early Intensive Behavioural Intervention – UCLA YAP Model are amongst the most best evaluated interventions for children with ASD.
  • There is good evidence that the EIBI - UCLA YAP Model results in important improvements for many children with an IQ above 35.
  • The EIBI – UCLA YAP Model does not result in significant changes in all areas of children’s functioning or produce similar gains for all children.
  • Individual response to intervention is variable and outcome is poorest for children of lower levels of intellectual and linguistic ability.
  • Studies comparing the EIBI – UCLA YAP Model with other autism- specific early provision have produced inconsistent findings. Some indicate that early specialist pre-school provision produces comparative results to the EIBI- UCLA YAP Model.
  • There is no evidence to support claims that the EIBI –UCLA YAP Model results in cure or recovery from autism.

Recommendations for Future Research

  • Research is needed to evaluate the longer term effects of EIBI - most studies involve only relatively short follow-up periods.
  • There is a need for more comparative studies of EIBI vs. other high quality, autism specific pre-school programmes.
  • Although some randomised control trials have been conducted these are small in number and the quality of the alternative intervention has not necessarily been of a high standard.
  • Any new research will need more focus on fidelity (of both the EIBI and the comparison interventions). There is also a need to explore in much greater detail moderators and mediators of treatment effectiveness.
  • In particular, the characteristics of the children who do, and do not respond to intervention require systematic investigation.
Updated
16 Jun 2022
Last Review
01 Sep 2016
Next Review
01 Jan 2023