logo
< Back to Glossary

Early Intensive Behavioural Interventions

Early intensive behavioural interventions (EIBIs) are multi-component packages which use a wide range of behavioural techniques and which are aimed at preschool children on the autism spectrum. 

EIBIs are sometimes referred to as 'ABA' because they are based on the principles of applied behaviour analysis.

Specific EIBIs include

  • Douglas Developmental Disabilities Center Program (also known as the Rutger's Program). A form of Early Intensive Behavioural Intervention, delivered by the Douglas Developmental Disabilities Center at Rutgers University, New Jersey.
  • May Institute Program. A form of early intensive behavioural intervention for autism run by the May Institute in Rochester, Massachusetts.
  • Murdoch Early Intervention Program. 
  • Nova Scotia Early Intensive Behavior Intervention Model. A model used in Nova Scotia, Candada and based on a behavioural intervention called pivotal response training.
  • Ontario Preschool Autism Initiative
  • Princeton Child Development Institute Program. A model developed by the Princeton Child Development Institute in New Jersey.
  • University of California at Los Angeles Young Autism Project model (also known as the Lovaas method or the UCLA YAP model). The original and possibly best known form of EIBI.

Related Glossaries


Related Pages


Related Publications

There are 147 publications matching this term. Click Here to view the list (New Window).


About This Glossary

This glossary is designed to explain some of the jargon and gobbledygook used by some people when they talk about autism or research..

You may be able to find more information, including links to other parts of this website, by clicking on the title of an item.


If you know of any other items we should include in this section, please email info@informationautism.org.

Please note that we reserve the right not to include an item if we feel that it is not appropriate.

Disclaimer

The fact that an intervention is listed in this glossary does not necessarily mean that we agree with its use. Nor does it necessarily mean that there is any scientifically valid or reliable evidence behind it.